After every mass shooting in the United States, there is a call from the looney Left for the National Rifle Association to be somehow punished or curtailed or stopped altogether from its activities, and it makes no sense.
I’m going to, I hope, slam-dunk this argument for good. To a Libtard, it won’t make a difference. But to those of you on the fence, who really just want the gun violence to cease, I hope it’ll make you think.
See this woman to the left of this text? Her name is “Eye Empress Sekhmet”, and she is now being investigated by local police for declaring open season on killing whites while holding a gun.
Now quick, a show of hands – how many of you believe that she is a card-carrying member of the National Rifle Association (hereafter known as the NRA)? Anyone? Anyone?
No one EVER would assume that. Yet, the moment a violet mass-shooting takes place in the United States, who is vilified first in the media – people like the NRA, who have their own views on the use and ownership of guns in the United States, or this racist cow packing heat? And it may not even be HER heat – at the risk of sounding racist, the guy she may have stolen it from might be really happy that she showed her face in public, so he knows where to get his stolen gun back from. That member of the NRA that got his gun stolen, that is.
Oh, now some of you are triggered, and you’re going to go haywire in the comments. Save your fingers for important pursuits like breaking and entering, or whatever you gun thugs do in your spare time. I’ll just delete dumb comments before they are published anyway. This isn’t a free speech zone – get your own blog if you want to rant about stupid crap with no thought process behind it.
So, if Miss Stable Mable here goes postal in a 7-11 and start blowing white people away with that gun that she legally purchased and registered with the proper local authorities (which she of course still has the receipt for), which she purchased from a legitimate source after obviously taking a psychological assessment first – which she also obviously passed with flying colors (dear God…) – how many of you would get on TV tonight and rant and rave about the NRA needing to take responsibility for gun crimes in America.
None of you?
Why’s that?
Because you’ll never even know it happened – because none of the news media will ever report it happened.
How do I know this, you ask? That seems like a racist thing to say, you state?
Here are some facts to shut up the nonsense:
- 13% of Americans are black, according to the latest estimates from the US Census Bureau.
- According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics:
-
- Black offenders committed 52% of homicides recorded in the data between 1980 and 2008. Only 45% of the offenders were white. Homicide is a broader category than “murder” but let’s not split hairs.
-
- 93% of black victims were killed by blacks.
-
- In 2013, the FBI pegged black criminals with 38% of murders, compared to 31.1% for whites.
- What about violent crime more generally? FBI arrest rates are one way into this. Over the last three years of data – 2011 to 2013 – 38.5% of people arrested for murder, manslaughter, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault were black – the highest racial group.
Knowing all this, one question, and be honest with yourself: How many of these were members of the NRA, in your opinion? 50%? 40%? 20%? 10% 5%? Try closer to ZERO PERCENT. The crimes were mostly committed by street thugs in gangs, who were either attacking rival gangs or robbing innocent people, etc.
So what is the NRA being blamed for all of America’s gun crimes for? Shouldn’t we be focusing on the black community and figure out what’s going on there? Nah, that’s racist. Let’s focus on the NRA, whose membership is mostly middle-aged white men…
…because… that’s… not… racist?
Recently, I was asked yet another of the “stupid questions” I often get on Quora:
And this was my answer:
That wouldn’t keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill – if the NRA revoked the person’s membership, that wouldn’t stop them from getting a gun regardless. Not too many people that are mentally ill, and have a desire to become a mass murderer, are going to want to register their gun ownership with a public group like the NRA anyway. What possible benefit would that have in doing that?

By Shawn J., Founder,
Calling Out Community
Posted: February 23, 2018
[God’s Got A Plan For You!]
The NRA doesn’t give gun permits, nor are they the national regulator of who gets to have a gun and who doesn’t. The NRA is there to teach safety and to ensure that the 2nd Amendment is protected against people who would very much love to remove guns from citizens – namely the government that the Second Amendment allowed citizens to arm themselves against in the first place.
NRA members are Americans that register their guns, know how to properly use them and store them, and will be the first people you would look to for ASSISTANCE if a nation like Russia ever attempted to invade the US through Canada, for example – which sounds far-fetched, but of course so was the Russian invasion of Afghanistan, the Ukraine and host of other nations over the last 70 years. They would be the first person you would look to if your own government ever decided to become dictatorial. I’ve heard a significant number of misguided and neurotic people accusing Trump of being a fascist, after all. NRA should be welcomed in the region, not attacked – they could be the only thing someday that saves your life.
I guarantee you, if the NRA were legally forced to shut down tomorrow across America, as some ill-founded plan to reduce gun crime – you would quickly find that you didn’t reduce gun crime one bit. Gun criminals aren’t in the NRA. Get your head out of your proverbial and realize that gun crime in America is caused by inner-city black, Latino and Asian thugs in gangs, for the most part, and by the mafia, Hells Angels, and other more organized crime groups.
And people like me who aren’t even American, but believe what the NRA stands for, thinks you are just playing the SJW card in the wrong poker game, and who has a big enough audience (23,000 followers today in 125 countries) to make some small impact. In the cutthroat dollars and cents business of airline travel, that might be all that’s required.
If they’re too stupid to figure out financially what’s up and what’s down, it’s time they both went DOWN. One less US airline with crappy service and insolence for their customers is no loss. Maybe Americans will finally have more competitive fares when one or both are GONE. 